Search results
25 de abr. de 2014 · On December 7, 2012, the Supreme Court agreed to hear Edie Windsor’s challenge to the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). Oral arguments took place on March 27, 2013. On June 26, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that section three of the so-called “Defense of Marriage Act” (DOMA) is unconstitutional and that the federal government cannot ...
美国诉温莎案 （ United States v. Windsor ）， 570 U.S. 12 (2013)，是 美国最高法院 有关 美国同性婚姻 的重要案件，该案是对 美国纽约南区地方法院 一审， 美国联邦第二巡回上诉法院 二审维持原判的 艾迪絲·溫莎 诉美利坚合众国案进行审查，在该案中，两审法院均 ...
United States v. Windsor. LII note: The U.S. Supreme Court has now decided United States v. Windsor. Edith Windsor and Thea Spyer married in Toronto in 2007 where same-sex marriages were legal. At the time of Spyer’s death, the state of New York recognized the couple’s marriage. However, the IRS denied Windsor use of a spousal estate tax ...
14 de mar. de 2023 · In the landmark case, United States v. Windsor, 570 U.S. 744 (2013), where the Court held the statute underlying the assessed tax unconstitutional, taxpayers in the same position as the respondent taxpayer were allowed, pursuant to a revenue ruling, to amend their tax return so long as the statute of limitations had not run on the year (s) at ...
UNITED STATES v. WINDSOR, EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF SPYER, ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 12–307. Argued March 27, 2013—Decided June 26, 2013. The State of New York recognizes the marriage of New York residents Edith Windsor and Thea Spyer, who wed in Ontario, Canada, in 2007. When Spyer ...
美国诉温莎案（）， 570 U.S. 12 (2013)，是美国最高法院有关美国同性婚姻的重要案件，该案是对美国纽约南区地方法院一审，美国联邦第二巡回上诉法院二审维持原判的艾迪絲·溫莎诉美利坚合众国案进行审查，在该案中，两审法院均认定《捍卫婚姻法案》第3章中将“婚姻”定义为“一名男性和一名 ...
31 de may. de 2013 · Yesterday, in its decision in United States v. Windsor, No. 12-307 (U.S. June 26, 2013), the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the Defense of Marriage Act ("DOMA") is unconstitutional. DOMA provided that, for federal purposes, same-sex marriages would not be recognized, even if such marriages were recognized for state law purposes.
