Yahoo España Búsqueda web

Search results

  1. Kenneth Geddes Wilson (8. kesäkuuta 1936 – 15. kesäkuuta 2013) oli yhdysvaltalainen fyysikko.Wilsonille myönnettiin Nobelin fysiikanpalkinto vuonna 1982 hänen aineiden olomuodonmuutoksiin liittyvien kriittisten ilmiöiden tutkimuksesta.. Wilson suoritti perustutkintonsa Harvardissa ja väitteli California Institute of Technologyssä eli Caltechissa vuonna 1961.

  2. 21 de jun. de 2013 · Kenneth Geddes Wilson was born on June 8, 1936, in Waltham, Mass., the first of three children of Edgar and Emily Buckingham Wilson. His father was a chemist at Harvard.

  3. Kenneth Geddes Wilson (* 8. Juni 1936 in Waltham, Massachusetts; † 15. Juni 2013 in Saco, Maine) war ein US-amerikanischer Physiker und Nobelpreisträger. Leben. Wilson, ein Sohn von Edgar Bright Wilson, studierte als Putnam-Fellow an der Universität ...

  4. 1 de nov. de 2013 · Kenneth Geddes Wilson. View large Download slide. Kenneth Geddes Wilson. Close modal. Leo Kadanoff, one of many physicists who inspired Ken, wrote after his death, “Ever since the early 1970s, the tools and concepts put forward by Wilson have formed the very basis of particle physics, field theory, and condensed matter physics.

  5. Kenneth G. Wilson (1936–2013) In Ithaca, the Nobel Prize did not come as a surprise. Fisher, Kadanoff, and Wilson had shared the 1980 Wolf Prize, and many just assumed that they would receive the Nobel in due course. The surprise, then, was that the Nobel committee saw in Wilson’s work a broader revolution in scien-tific thought.

  6. Kenneth Geddes Wilson (n. 8 iunie 1936 , Waltham ⁠( d ) , Massachusetts , SUA – d. 15 iunie 2013 , Saco ⁠( d ) , Maine , SUA ) a fost un fizician american , laureat al Premiului Nobel pentru Fizică , în 1982 , pentru teoria sa privind fenomenele critice asociate cu tranzițiile de fază.

  7. Kenneth G. Wilson (1936–2013) In Ithaca, the Nobel Prize did not come as a surprise. Fisher, Kadanoff, and Wilson had shared the 1980 Wolf Prize, and many just assumed that they would receive the Nobel in due course. The surprise, then, was that the Nobel committee saw in Wilson’s work a broader revolution in scien-tific thought.