Search results
Finkelman situates this infamous holding within a solid record of support for slavery and hostility to free blacks.Supreme Injustice boldly documents the entanglements that alienated three major justices from America’s founding ideals and embedded racism ever deeper in American civic life.
Legal historian Paul Finkelman discusses his book Supreme Injustice, which highlights the three most important Supreme Court Justices before the Civil War—John Marshall, Roger B. Taney, and...
8 de ene. de 2018 · In Supreme Injustice, the distinguished legal historian Paul Finkelman establishes an authoritative account of each justice’s proslavery position, the reasoning behind his opposition to black...
3 de dic. de 2018 · Supreme Injustice contains no call to topple monuments or to rewrite history books. [Finkelman] simply lays out a convincing case that we must in thinking about our national heritage grapple with the unsettling truths about the humanity we denied slaves and the legal protections we gave their owners.
29 de oct. de 2018 · Issue Section: Book Reviews. In Supreme Injustice, the prolific Paul Finkelman takes on the three most important Supreme Court justices of the antebellum era: John Marshall, Joseph Story, and Roger B. Taney. When questions regarding slavery came before them, all three justices “invariably voted against liberty and in favor of ...
This book explores the slavery jurisprudence of the three most important justices on the antebellum Supreme Court—Chief Justice John Marshall, Associate Justice Joseph Story, and Chief Justice Roger Brooke Taney. All three believed that slavery—or more precisely, opposition to slavery—threatened national unity and political stability.
9 de ene. de 2003 · Supreme Injustice: How the High Court Hijacked Election 2000. Alan M. Dershowitz. Published: 9 January 2003. Cite. Permissions. Share. Abstract. Millions of Americans were mystified by, and outraged, by the US Supreme Court's role in deciding the presidential election of 2000.
