Search results
4 de ene. de 2002 · “The Federalist No. 16, [4 December 1787],” Founders Online, National Archives, https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Hamilton/01-04-02-0170. [Original source: The Papers of Alexander Hamilton , vol. 4, January 1787 – May 1788 , ed. Harold C. Syrett.
Federalist No. 16, titled " The Same Subject Continued: The Insufficiency of the Present Confederation to Preserve the Union ", is an essay by Alexander Hamilton. It is one of the eighty-five articles collected in the document The Federalist Papers (formerly known as The Federalists ).
27 de ene. de 2016 · It must carry its agency to the persons of the citizens. It must stand in need of no intermediate legislations, but must itself be empowered to employ the arm of the ordinary magistrate to execute its own resolutions. The majesty of the national authority must be manifested through the medium of the courts of justice.
Federalist No. 16; Federalist No. 17; Federalist No. 18; Federalist No. 19; Federalist No. 20; Federalist No. 21; Federalist No. 22; Federalist No. 23; Federalist No. 24; Federalist No. 25; Federalist No. 26; Federalist No. 27; Federalist No. 28; Federalist No. 29; Federalist No. 30; Federalist No. 31; Federalista No. 32; Federalist ...
20 de dic. de 2021 · FEDERALIST No. 14. Objections to the Proposed Constitution From Extent of Territory Answered . FEDERALIST No. 15. The Insufficiency of the Present Confederation to Preserve the Union . FEDERALIST No. 16. The Same Subject Continued (The Insufficiency of the Present Confederation to Preserve the Union) FEDERALIST No. 17.
Federalist Number (No.) 16 (1787) is an essay by British-American politician Alexander Hamilton arguing for the ratification of the United States Constitution. The full title of the essay is "The Same Subject Continued: The Insufficiency of the Present Confederation to Preserve the Union."
The last eight papers (Nos. 78–85) were republished in the New York newspapers between June 14 and August 16, 1788. The authors of The Federalist intended to influence the voters to ratify the Constitution. In Federalist No. 1, they explicitly set that debate in broad political terms:
