Search results
The Buddha's teaching of the Dharma is based on two truths: a truth of worldly convention and an ultimate truth. Those who do not understand the distinction drawn between these two truths do not understand the Buddha's profound truth.
29 de jul. de 2018 · Learn how reality is explained in the doctrine of the Two Truths, which says that existence can be understood as both ultimate and conventional. The ultimate truth is that there are no distinctive things or beings, and the conventional truth is how we usually see the world.
22 de oct. de 2023 · The Ultimate Truth, known as Paramattha Sacca, is considered to be an absolute truth that never changes (Parama aviparito). However, the term “unchanging” does not refer to eternal or immutable; rather, it indicates that there is no difference between the past, present, and future.
17 de feb. de 2011 · Ultimate truth is, on this definition, a phenomenon (dharma) that is ultimately existent, and ultimately existent are ultimately causally efficient. Phenomenon that is ultimately causally efficient is intrinsically or objectively real, existing in and of itself as a “unique particular” (svalakṣaṇa).
Ultimate truth is the understanding that all phenomena are empty—empty of any inherent self-nature, empty of permanence, empty of any concrete meaning or value or definition or function. The ultimate nature of things, which we call empty, is how things really are when they are not obscured by conventional stories.
The Ultimate Truth. The Ultimate Truth can be found in the Teaching of the Buddhism. B uddhism recognizes two kinds of Truth. The apparent conventional truth and the real or ultimate Truth. The ultimate Truth can be realized only through meditation, and not theorizing or speculating.
17 de feb. de 2011 · Ultimate truth, on the other hand, requires the metaphysical transcendence of conventionality. Unlike conventional reality, it is neither presupposed nor projected by ignorance. Ultimate truth, in Gorampa’s words: “is inexpressible through words and is beyond the scope of cognition” (1969a: 370a).
