Yahoo España Búsqueda web

Search results

  1. 3 de dic. de 2023 · I think "See also" is clearly more common than "Also see" in this context. My question is whether "Also see" should be regarded as incorrect. My interpretation of the syntax is that the heading starts a sentence of sorts, where the items that follow are proper nouns, and that "Also see" is an incorrect way to start such a sentence.

  2. This template is used to create hatnotes to point to a small number of other related titles at the top of article sections (excluding the lead ). It looks like this: See also: Article. Do not use this template on top of a page, where hatnotes are for disambiguation and not for related topics (according to WP:RELATED ).

  3. 3 de sept. de 2015 · 'see' indicates that the cited authority clearly supports, but does not directly state, the proposition. 'see also' indicates additional material that supports the proposition, less directly than 'see' or 'accord'. 'cf.' (Latin 'confer') = 'compare': points to a different proposition, but one sufficiently analogous to lend support.

  4. 3 de nov. de 2022 · Nov 3, 2022 at 13:41. According to APA guidelines, the intro signal "see" is to be used, if a statement is based on the works of another author, but a step of inference is made from their works to reach the statement made.

  5. 29 de mar. de 2019 · In this example the first three verses contain the quote exactly while the following four citations are verses with a similar meaning. I know of some parenthetical citation abbreviations like "e.g." and "cf." Does anything similar exist for "see also"?

  6. 12 de ene. de 2017 · It is common for authors to refer readers to additional resources in footnotes. Following CMS §14.37, we encourage authors doing so to distinguish between the terms see or see also and the abbreviation cf. (Latin confer ). To refer authors to similar resources, use see or see also.

  7. 26 de feb. de 2024 · see, see also, and similar phrases. Phrases like see, see also, view, view all, and watch it later are fine to use from an inclusive design perspective, as long as they're being used in contexts that otherwise support accessibility.