Search results
的核對清單(checklist)4,5；1996 年Jadad 等人提 出了Jadad 評分表 (Jadad scale)，共有5 個評讀 細項，符合一項得1 分，得分從0 分到5 分， 讓讀者對於隨機對照試驗的品質產生量化的概 念，並且因其簡單易用，成為目前評讀隨機對 照試驗工具中最常被引用的一種6,7；1998 年
26 de sept. de 2014 · The Consolidated Standards for Reporting Trials (CONSORT) are aimed to standardize clinical trial reporting. Our objective is to compare the quality of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) published in 2005–2009 and 2011–2012 according to the current CONSORT statements and Jadad scale. Data Sources: Reports on RCTs of TCM in the China National Knowledge ...
29 de feb. de 2020 · Randomized controlled trial (individual or cluster) The first RCT was designed by Hill BA (1897–1991) and became the “gold standard” for experimental study design [12, 13] up to now.Nowadays, the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (which was introduced in 2008 and edited on March 20, 2011) is the most commonly recommended tool for RCT [9, 14], which is called “RoB”.
13 de abr. de 2022 · Zhang et al., in a similar quality assessment of RCTs conducted in China, found that randomization and blinding were adequate in only one-third of the studies; however, dropouts were appropriately mentioned in 53% of the studies.[20,21] In a study on quality assessment of RCTs in oral and maxillofacial surgery, the mean scale of the Jadad score was 3.06 points.
1 de sept. de 2006 · To assess literature quality and risk of bias, we evaluated RCTs using the Jadad score (26) and evaluated observational controlled studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) (27). In this ...
1 de sept. de 2022 · Method. We built a program based on artificial intelligence (AI) approaches, designed to assess the robustness of a clinical trial by estimating its Jadad's score. The program is composed of five Recursive Neural Networks (RNN), each of them trained to spot one specific item constituting the Jadad's scale. After training, the algorithm was tested on two different validation sets (one from the ...
11. Modified Jadad score (/8) o 1 o 2 o 3 o 4 o 5 o 6 o 7 o 8 12. Was the allocation adequately concealed? (e.g., pharmacy controlled randomized scheme, sequentially numbered opaque, sealed envelope, sequentially numbered/coded identical containers, central randomization by phone) o Yes o No o Unclear 13.
