Search results
4 de ene. de 2002 · The Federalist No. 1 1. [New York, October 27, 1787] To the People of the State of New York. After an unequivocal 2 experience of the inefficacy 3 of the subsisting 4 Fœderal Government, you are called upon 5 to deliberate on 6 a new Constitution for the United States of America.
- Introductory Note
The edition of The Federalist published by Jacob Gideon in...
- Nhprc
Latest News NHPRC to award $2 million for access to...
- Introductory Note
Federalist No. 1, titled "General Introduction", is an essay by Alexander Hamilton. It is the first essay of The Federalist Papers, and it serves as a general outline of the ideas that the writers wished to explore regarding the proposed constitution of the United States.
Summary. On October 27, 1787, Alexander Hamilton published the opening essay of The Federalist Papers — Federalist 1. The Federalist Papers were a series of 85 essays printed in newspapers to persuade the American people (and especially Hamilton’s fellow New Yorkers) to support ratification of the new Constitution.
Escribió The Federalist No. 1 (El Federalista Número 1) y en este ensayo explicó el propósito por el cual el pueblo debería prestarle su atención a ambos lados del debate.
Hamilton argues for the new Constitution as the safest course for the liberty, dignity, and happiness of the people of the United States. He warns against the dangers of faction, ambition, and persecution in the debate over the proposed government.
20 de dic. de 2021 · FEDERALIST No. 1. General Introduction . FEDERALIST No. 2. Concerning Dangers from Foreign Force and Influence . FEDERALIST No. 3. The Same Subject Continued (Concerning Dangers From Foreign Force and Influence) FEDERALIST No. 4. The Same Subject Continued (Concerning Dangers From Foreign Force and Influence) FEDERALIST No. 5.
27 de ene. de 2016 · Hamilton argues that the Constitution is the result of reflection and choice, not accident and force, and that its ratification is crucial for the survival of the union. He warns of the obstacles and dangers of the opposition, and urges moderation and candor in the debate.
