Search results
24 de mar. de 2021 · Hermeneutics and the human sciences : essays on language, action, and interpretation. "This is a collection in translation of essays by Paul Ricoeur which presents a comprehensive view of his philosophical hermeneutics, its relation to the views of his predecessors in the tradition and its consequences for the social sciences.
Title: Hermeneutics and the human sciences : essays on language, action and interpretation / Paul Ricoeur ; edited, translated and introduced by John B. Thompson. Description: New York : Cambridge University Press, 2016. | Originally published: New York : Cambridge University Press, 1981. | Includes bibliographical references and index.
30 de sept. de 2020 · Essays on Language, Action and Interpretation. Search within full text. Get access. Cited by 1288. Paul Ricoeur. Edited and translated by John B. Thompson. Publisher: Cambridge University Press. Online publication date: July 2016. Print publication year: 2016. Online ISBN: 9781316534984. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316534984. Subjects:
Hermeneutics and the human sciences: essays on language, action and interpretation. Collation. 314 p. Material type. book. Year of publication. 1981. ISBN. 0-521-23497-2. 0-521-28002 (pbk) Imprint. UK. Country of publication. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Language. English. Person as author. Ricoeur, Paul. Thompson, John B.
1 de ene. de 2022 · Hermeneutics and the human sciences : essays on language, action, and interpretation. Collected and translated by John B. Thompson, this collection of essays by Paul Ricoeur includes many that had never appeared in English before the volume's publication in 1981.
Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences. Essays on Language, Action and Interpretation. Part of Cambridge Philosophy Classics. Real Author: Paul Ricoeur. Editor and Translator: John B. Thompson. View all contributors. Date Published: August 2016. availability: Available. format: Paperback. isbn: 9781316508206. Rate & review. $ 27.99 (G) Paperback.
For Dilthey, ‘explanation’ referred to the model of intelligibility borrowed from the natural sciences and applied to the historical disciplines by positivist schools; ‘interpretation’, on the other hand, was a derivative form of understanding, which Dilthey regarded as the fundamental attitude of the human sciences and as that which could alone preserve the fundamental difference ...
