Yahoo España Búsqueda web

Search results

  1. 17 de oct. de 2003 · Runaway Jury: Directed by Gary Fleder. With John Cusack, Gene Hackman, Dustin Hoffman, Rachel Weisz. A juror on the inside and a woman on the outside manipulate a court trial involving a major gun manufacturer.

  2. RUNAWAY JURY is something else. It reminds me of a lot of crime shows I watched with my grandparents. I think that this movie is a perfect combination of Dateline and 48 hours, ...

  3. Runaway Jury is a film directed by Gary Fleder with John Cusack, Gene Hackman, Dustin Hoffman, Rachel Weisz .... Year: 2003. Original title: Runaway Jury. Synopsis: When a young widow in New Orleans brings a civil suit against the powerful corporate consortium she holds responsible for her husband’s murder, she sets in motion a multi-million dollar case.

  4. www.wikiwand.com › es › Runaway_JuryRunaway Jury - Wikiwand

    Runaway Jury ( El jurado en España y Tribunal en fuga en Hispanoamérica; estrenada el 17 de octubre de 2003 en Estados Unidos, el 11 de diciembre del mismo año en Argentina y el 6 de febrero de 2004 en España) es una película protagonizada por John Cusack, Gene Hackman, Dustin Hoffman y Rachel Weisz; dirigida por Gary Fleder y basada en la ...

  5. In New Orleans, Louisiana, Celeste Wood's life is changed in a blinding flash when a failed day trader at her husband's stock brokerage firm shows up at his former workplace with a semiautomatic handgun and opens fire on his former colleagues, including Celeste's husband. Two years later, and armed with pro bono attorney Wendell Rohr (Dustin ...

  6. Runaway Jury. After a workplace shooting in New Orleans, a trial against the gun manufacturer pits lawyer Wendell Rohr against shady jury consultant Rankin Fitch, who uses illegal means to stack the jury with people sympathetic to the defense. But when juror Nicholas Easter and his girlfriend, Marlee, reveal their ability to sway the jury, a ...

  7. 17 de oct. de 2003 · McGill, as the judge, treats them like an unruly grade school class. The movie's ending is underwhelming. There's a whole lot of explaining going on, as we discover everyone's hidden motives long after they've ceased to be relevant. And there's not enough behind-the-scenes stuff in the jury room showing Easter at work (what we see is a study in ...