Yahoo España Búsqueda web

Search results

  1. The Buddha's teaching of the Dharma is based on two truths: a truth of worldly convention and an ultimate truth. Those who do not understand the distinction drawn between these two truths do not understand the Buddha's profound truth.

  2. 29 de jul. de 2018 · Learn how reality is explained in the doctrine of the Two Truths, which says that existence can be understood as both ultimate and conventional. The ultimate truth is that there are no distinctive things or beings, and the conventional truth is how we usually see the world.

  3. 22 de oct. de 2023 · The Ultimate Truth, known as Paramattha Sacca, is considered to be an absolute truth that never changes (Parama aviparito). However, the term “unchanging” does not refer to eternal or immutable; rather, it indicates that there is no difference between the past, present, and future.

  4. 17 de feb. de 2011 · Ultimate truth is, on this definition, a phenomenon (dharma) that is ultimately existent, and ultimately existent are ultimately causally efficient. Phenomenon that is ultimately causally efficient is intrinsically or objectively real, existing in and of itself as a “unique particular” (svalakṣaṇa).

  5. The first four chapters of the sūtra discuss the concept of ultimate truth ( paramartha) and its "ineffable and of a non-dual character". The fifth chapter discusses the eight consciousnesses, including the "Storehouse Consciousnesses". The sixth chapter presents the three natures.

  6. The conventional truth about something is its dependence on conditions. The ultimate truth is its emptiness. This doctrine has its roots in the words of the historical Buddha, who acknowledged that some experiences, in particular nirvana, lie beyond the ability of language to describe.

  7. 17 de feb. de 2011 · Ultimate truth, on the other hand, requires the metaphysical transcendence of conventionality. Unlike conventional reality, it is neither presupposed nor projected by ignorance. Ultimate truth, in Gorampa’s words: “is inexpressible through words and is beyond the scope of cognition” (1969a: 370a).